Ranked shortlist · 10 of 27 parks
Best parks in Suwon
The 10 most notable parks in Suwon, in rank order. The order is curation quality — how well attested and how complete each record is — not popularity, and no place on this list paid to be on it.
-
1
코코몽에코파크
272 Gogi-dong
listed by Meta and Overture Maps Foundation · record has a website, a phone and an address · Overture confidence 0.99 · rank score 2.447, percentile 100 of 27
-
2
라바파크 평촌의왕점
갈미2로 7
listed by Meta and Overture Maps Foundation · record has a website, a phone and an address · Overture confidence 0.99 · rank score 2.442, percentile 96.15 of 27
-
3
의왕자연학습공원
Woram-dong
listed by Meta and Overture Maps Foundation · record has a website, a phone and an address · Overture confidence 0.98 · rank score 2.395, percentile 92.31 of 27
-
4
히어로플레이파크
동탄광역환승로 73
listed by Meta and Overture Maps Foundation · record has a website, a phone and an address · Overture confidence 0.98 · rank score 2.346, percentile 88.46 of 27
-
5
서울대공원
listed by Meta and Overture Maps Foundation · record has a website and a phone · Overture confidence 0.97 · rank score 2.285, percentile 84.62 of 27
-
6
안양 중앙공원
listed by Meta and Overture Maps Foundation · record has a website and a phone · Overture confidence 0.95 · rank score 2.156, percentile 80.77 of 27
-
7
효원공원
팔달구 효원로307번길 26
listed by Meta and Overture Maps Foundation · record has a website, a phone and an address · Overture confidence 0.94 · rank score 2.113, percentile 76.92 of 27
-
8
자유공원
호계동 1112
listed by Meta and Overture Maps Foundation · record has a website and an address · Overture confidence 0.98 · rank score 2.109, percentile 73.08 of 27
-
9
베이비엔젤스
광교로 191
listed by Meta and Overture Maps Foundation · record has a website, a phone and an address · Overture confidence 0.93 · rank score 2.040, percentile 69.23 of 27
-
10
평촌공원
동안구 부림동 1589-2
listed by Meta and Overture Maps Foundation · record has a website and an address · Overture confidence 0.97 · rank score 2.033, percentile 65.38 of 27
How this list is made
Every place in this group was scored by the same model, with each term z-normalised inside the group and capped, so a famous chain cannot win by being famous everywhere. The weights, verbatim:
- attestation by independent providers
- +0.35
- record completeness (website, phone, address)
- +0.25
- Overture existence confidence
- +0.20
- Michelin designation (Wikidata, CC0)
- +0.40
- brand fame (Wikidata sitelinks)
- −0.15
- same-name chain collision
- −0.30
Curation quality, not popularity: how well attested and how complete a record is.
No licensable popularity signal; this ranks curation quality, not taste
Independent calibration: 533 Michelin-starred restaurants in the catalogue were checked against their own group. It is the only designation that covers more than one place, so the ranking is corroborated for restaurants and uncorroborated elsewhere — the manifest says so per run. The catalogue carries no rating, review count, price or opening hours, so this file has none.
Nobody paid for placement: no ads, no sponsored results, no ratings for sale.
Data: AllThePlaces (CC0-1.0), BrightQuery (CDLA-Permissive-2.0), DAC (CDLA-Permissive-2.0), Foursquare Open Source Places (Apache-2.0), Meta (CDLA-Permissive-2.0), Microsoft (CDLA-Permissive-2.0), Overture Maps Foundation (CDLA-Permissive-2.0), PinMeTo (CDLA-Permissive-2.0), RenderSEO (CDLA-Permissive-2.0).